Oxford Index Browse

You are looking at 1-3 of 3 items for:

Property Law x Welfare Economics x clear all

THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION

Richard A. Epstein, F. Scott Kieff and Daniel F. Spulber.

in Journal of Competition Law & Economics

March 2012; p ublished online March 2012 .

Journal Article. Subjects: Law and Economics; General Economics; Technological Change; Research and Development; History of Economic Thought (1925 onwards); Household Behaviour and Family Economics; Property Law; Microeconomics; Analysis of Collective Decision-making; Manufacturing; Welfare Economics; Antitrust Issues and Policies; Economic History; Production and Organizations; Market Structure and Pricing; Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainy; Regulation and Industrial Policy; Capitalist Systems; Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behaviour; Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance; History of Economic Thought (to 1925). 21147 words.

In its recent report entitled, “The Evolving IP Marketplace,” the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposes a far-reaching regulatory approach (Proposal) that is likely to interfere with the...

Go to Oxford Journals »  home page

Harm–Benefit Interactions

Oren Bar-Gill and Ariel Porat.

in American Law and Economics Review

March 2014; p ublished online September 2013 .

Journal Article. Subjects: Welfare Economics; Property Law; Tort Law; Contract Law. 10551 words.

We analyze a distinct category of cases—Harm–Benefit cases—in which harm to the victim is accompanied by benefit to the injurer. While liability should be imposed when the benefit exceeds...

Go to Oxford Journals »  home page

SUBSTITUTING COMPLEMENTS

Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci and Francesco Parisi.

in Journal of Competition Law & Economics

September 2006; p ublished online November 2006 .

Journal Article. Subjects: Property Law; Welfare Economics; Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance; Market Structure and Pricing. 6043 words.

Abstract

The presence of multiple sellers in the provision of (nonsubstitutable) complementary goods leads to outcomes that are worse than those generated by...

Go to Oxford Journals »  home page