Journal Article

Determinants of Influenza Vaccination, 2003–2004: Shortages, Fallacies and Disparities

Timothy F. Jones, Ingram L. Amanda, Allen S. Craig and William Schaffner

in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Published on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America

Volume 39, issue 12, pages 1824-1828
Published in print December 2004 | ISSN: 1058-4838
Published online December 2004 | e-ISSN: 1537-6591 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/427153
Determinants of Influenza Vaccination, 2003–2004: Shortages, Fallacies and Disparities

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Microbiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Background. The influenza outbreak of 2003–2004 received substantial media attention, including widespread reports of a severe season and vaccine shortages. Understanding the determinants of vaccine receipt is important for guiding immunization policies.

Methods. From February through June 2004, we administered a structured telephone survey to Tennessee residents, using random-digit dialing methodology.

Results. Questionnaires were completed by 4028 persons, of whom 2077 (52%) had received influenza vaccination during the previous outbreak season. Of these 2077 vaccine recipients, 63% received vaccine at a private medical clinic, 14% at a workplace, 11% at a health department, and 7% at a pharmacy. Three-fourths of respondents reported a risk factor for which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends vaccination; of those, 41% went unvaccinated, including 26% who had seen a medical provider for other reasons during the influenza season. More than 40% of persons aged ⩾50, more than half of health care workers, and 70% of pregnant women were not immunized. Blacks, rural residents, and lower-income respondents were significantly less likely to be immunized than were comparison groups. Of respondents who were vaccinated, 6% reported difficulties obtaining vaccination (most commonly, they reported that vaccine was not readily available). One-fourth of unvaccinated persons had been offered vaccination but had declined it; of these, 35% thought it unnecessary and 33% believed it would make them ill. Of those not vaccinated, 8% reported requesting vaccination but not receiving it, most commonly because it was unavailable.

Conclusions. Many barriers contribute to disparities in rates of influenza vaccination, of which inadequate supply is only one component. Myths regarding influenza vaccination persist tenaciously. A multifaceted approach to increasing immunization rates is critical.

Journal Article.  3106 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Infectious Diseases ; Immunology ; Public Health and Epidemiology ; Microbiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.