Journal Article

Rapid Simultaneous Diagnosis of Infections with Respiratory Syncytial Viruses A and B, Influenza Viruses A and B, and Human Parainfluenza Virus Types 1, 2, and 3 by Multiplex Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction-Enzyme Hybridization Assay (Hexaplex)

Jiang Fan, Kelly J. Henrickson and Laura L. Savatski

in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Published on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America

Volume 26, issue 6, pages 1397-1402
Published in print June 1998 | ISSN: 1058-4838
Published online June 1998 | e-ISSN: 1537-6591 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/516357
Rapid Simultaneous Diagnosis of Infections with Respiratory Syncytial Viruses A and B, Influenza Viruses A and B, and Human Parainfluenza Virus Types 1, 2, and 3 by Multiplex Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction-Enzyme Hybridization Assay (Hexaplex)

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Microbiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

A multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction–enzyme hybridization assay (Hexaplex; Prodesse, Milwaukee) was developed and used to rapidly detect and quantitate RNA of respiratory syncytial viruses A and B, influenza viruses A and B, and human parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3 in nasal wash specimens in a single test. Primers and probes originated from highly conserved regions of each viral genome. Six and a half primer pairs were mixed for the simultaneous detection and quantitation of RNA from seven different respiratory viruses. We tested 109 clinical samples with this assay. Twenty-nine virus culture-positive samples were all positive by Hexaplex. Samples from 40 symptomatic patients were negative by virus culture, but eight of these were positive by Hexaplex. Forty samples from asymptomatic children were negative by both virus culture and Hexaplex. No cross-reactions were noted among 17 different respiratory viruses with use of this assay. Hexaplex was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–1.0) and 98% specific (95% CI, 0.97–0.99). All eight “false-positive” Hexaplex results (in comparison with negative viral culture results) were for symptomatic patients with low numbers of virus RNA copies. This finding suggests that Hexaplex may be more sensitive than virus culture. Our data demonstrate that Hexaplex is a rapid, sensitive, and specific quantitative test for the diagnosis of infections with these seven common respiratory viruses.

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Infectious Diseases ; Immunology ; Public Health and Epidemiology ; Microbiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.