Journal Article

Efficacy of Soap and Water and Alcohol-Based Hand-Rub Preparations against Live H1N1 Influenza Virus on the Hands of Human Volunteers

M. Lindsay Grayson, Sharmila Melvani, Julian Druce, Ian G. Barr, Susan A. Ballard, Paul D. R. Johnson, Tasoula Mastorakos and Christopher Birch

in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Published on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America

Volume 48, issue 3, pages 285-291
Published in print February 2009 | ISSN: 1058-4838
Published online February 2009 | e-ISSN: 1537-6591 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/595845
Efficacy of Soap and Water and Alcohol-Based Hand-Rub Preparations against Live H1N1 Influenza Virus on the Hands of Human Volunteers

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Microbiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Background. Although pandemic and avian influenza are known to be transmitted via human hands, there are minimal data regarding the effectiveness of routine hand hygiene (HH) protocols against pandemic and avian influenza.

Methods. Twenty vaccinated, antibody-positive health care workers had their hands contaminated with 1 mL of 107 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID)>50/0.1 mL live human influenza A virus (H1N1; A/New Caledonia/20/99) before undertaking 1 of 5 HH protocols (no HH [control], soap and water hand washing [SW], or use of 1 of 3 alcohol-based hand rubs [61.5% ethanol gel, 70% ethanol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine solution, or 70% isopropanol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine solution]). H1N1 concentrations were assessed before and after each intervention by viral culture and real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The natural viability of H1N1 on hands for >60 min without HH was also assessed.

Results. There was an immediate reduction in culture-detectable and PCR-detectable H1N1 after brief cutaneous air drying—14 of 20 health care workers had H1N1 detected by means of culture (mean reduction, 103–4 TCID>50/0.1 mL), whereas 6 of 20 had no viable H1N1 recovered; all 20 health care workers had similar changes in PCR test results. Marked antiviral efficacy was noted for all 4 HH protocols, on the basis of culture results (14 of 14 had no culturable H1N1; P<.002) and PCR results (P<.001; cycle threshold value range, 33.3–39.4), with SW statistically superior (P<.001) to all 3 alcohol-based hand rubs, although the actual difference was only 1–100 virus copies/µL. There was minimal reduction in H1N1 after 60 min without HH.

Conclusions. HH with SW or alcohol-based hand rub is highly effective in reducing influenza A virus on human hands, although SW is the most effective intervention. Appropriate HH may be an important public health initiative to reduce pandemic and avian influenza transmission.

Journal Article.  4319 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Infectious Diseases ; Immunology ; Public Health and Epidemiology ; Microbiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.