The Religiously Encumbered Self

Catharine Cookson

in Regulating Religion

Published in print May 2001 | ISBN: 9780195129441
Published online November 2003 | e-ISBN: 9780199834105 | DOI:
The Religiously Encumbered Self

Show Summary Details


How we view the self, acting as moral agent, will inevitably affect our interpretive actions when a statute and a religious obligation conflict. The classic liberal ontology of the self (“voluntarist”) is self‐unencumbered and free to choose his or her beliefs. The natural conclusion to which the courts are led by the voluntarist conception of the self is that the religious adherent made a free and voluntary choice to break the law, an obviously bad choice. What is lost in the voluntarist conception of religious liberty is that a religious practice is not an isolated and free choice but is, rather, an integrated and integral part of a belief system or “framework.” The religious adherent is in fact an encumbered self whose world construct cannot be easily altered in order to make a choice that is alien to that framework.

Keywords: framework; freedom of choice; liberal ontology of the self; moral agency; religiously; unencumbered self; voluntarist

Chapter.  4925 words. 

Subjects: Religious Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.