John L. Thompson

in Writing the Wrongs

Published in print October 2001 | ISBN: 9780195137361
Published online November 2003 | e-ISBN: 9780199834730 | DOI:

Series: Oxford Studies in Historical Theology


Show Summary Details


In using contemporary feminist questions and concerns as a lens with which to examine precritical commentators, one may argue that these traditional interpreters come off surprisingly well: they certainly do not neglect these stories; though prone to gender stereotypes, they can suspend their male bias when making ethical inquiries; they resist “blaming the victim” and do not categorically excuse the men, even when there is New Testament testimony on behalf of these Old Testament figures; and they frequently display signs of empathy and identification with the women of these narratives. Consequently, there is reason to consider that precritical commentators of the past and feminists today have both formal and material interests in common, including the use of various reading strategies to make problematic texts relevant, a desire to find edification in the biblical text, and an intense preoccupation with morality and justice. Even the feminist commitment to a hermeneutic of suspicion finds at least a partial corollary among precritical interpreters, though for the latter, the hermeneutic of suspicion is finally subordinate to a hermeneutic of charity and the presupposition that the Bible represents a coherent text.

Keywords: charity; feminist biblical criticism; hermeneutic of charity; hermeneutic of consent; hermeneutic of suspicion; precritical interpretation; rule of charity; rule of faith

Chapter.  18934 words. 

Subjects: Biblical Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.