Chapter

 NEGOTIATING EMPIRICISM

Lorraine Code

in Ecological Thinking

Published in print April 2006 | ISBN: 9780195159431
Published online September 2006 | e-ISBN: 9780199786411 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195159438.003.0004

Series: Studies in Feminist Philosophy

  NEGOTIATING EMPIRICISM

Show Summary Details

Preview

In this chapter, an analysis of “statements of fact” in two domains of natural knowledge-making — medicine and law — shows how they enact sedimented assumptions about women, blacks, and other so-called social minorities. Hence, judgments and diagnoses alike reproduce structures of asymmetrical social power and privilege. The analysis recommends a negotiated empiricism: an empirically based and evidence-respecting position that takes observational evidence seriously, yet contends that evidence does not speak for itself in its claims to count as evidence or in its meanings and implications. The argument shows how experiential, testimonial reports claim an enhanced, if not uncontested, credibility and authority in this approach to knowledge. The chapter concludes with a critical reading of Donna Haraway’s “situated knowledges” as a principal contributor to the conceptual apparatus that frames ecological thinking.

Keywords: negotiating empiricism; medicine; law; statements of fact; evidence; testimonial reports; credibility; Donna Haraway; situated knowledges; power; privilege

Chapter.  14045 words. 

Subjects: Feminist Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.