Chapter

The Tenability of Partition as a Mode of Conflict Regulation: Comparing Ireland With Palestine–Land of Israel

Sammy Smooha

in Northern Ireland and the Divided World

Published in print August 2001 | ISBN: 9780199244348
Published online November 2003 | e-ISBN: 9780191599866 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199244340.003.0013
 The Tenability of Partition as a Mode of Conflict Regulation: Comparing Ireland With Palestine–Land of Israel

Show Summary Details

Preview

Smooha argues that Jews have settled in Palestine – Land of Israel in sufficient strength to establish a strong independent state in part of the area (pre‐1967 Israel), although their attempt to incorporate the rest (the West Bank and Gaza) by settlement has failed. As a result, partition has become the most feasible way to resolve the Jewish–Palestinian conflict. In Ireland, by contrast, the position of British settlers (Protestants) is said to be much weaker than their Jewish counterparts. The Protestants are weak demographically, lack international legitimacy, are not supported by Britain, and are faced with a confident Irish nationalism. As a consequence, the historical trend points to Britain's withdrawal and an end to the partition of Ireland as the most likely form of conflict resolution.

Keywords: Britain; conflict resolution; international legitimacy; Ireland; Israel; Northern Ireland; Palestine; partition; Protestants; settlers

Chapter.  11378 words. 

Subjects: UK Politics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.