Clinical treatment decisions

Fiona Randall and R.S. Downie

in Palliative Care Ethics

Second edition

Published in print June 1999 | ISBN: 9780192630681
Published online November 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191730078 | DOI:
Clinical treatment decisions

Show Summary Details


This chapter discusses distinctions between medical treatment and care, benefits to burdens/risks calculus, obligations and options in treatment decisions, life-prolonging treatments, treatments to alleviate suffering, the role of relatives, conflicts of interest between patients, reassessment of treatment decisions, autonomous to non-autonomous conditions, and advance statements and proxy decision makers. Treatment options are selected by carers on the basis of the benefits to burdens/risks calculus. They are then offered to autonomous patients, or considered by carers and relatives on behalf of non-autonomous patients. The tightness or wrongness of life-prolonging and life-sustaining treatments in palliative care depends on the particular clinical circumstances in which they are considered. Carers should not intend to cause overall harm to patients in the interests of relatives, but it is sometimes morally justifiable to compromise the good of one patient in the interests of others.

Keywords: burdens/risks calculus; life-prolonging treatments; alleviating suffering; proxy decision makers; non-autonomous patients

Chapter.  13224 words. 

Subjects: Palliative Medicine

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.