Chapter

Limitations

Diana B. Petitti

in Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Second edition

Published in print November 1999 | ISBN: 9780195133646
Published online September 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780199863761 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195133646.003.17

Series: Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Limitations

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Having taken a position of advocacy for the use of the three synthesis methods in the first sixteen chapters, this chapter identifies the serious limitations of the methods both theoretical and practical. It begins by discussing the limitations of systematic review and meta-analysis based on empiric studies of the quality, reproducibility, and predictive validity published up to the year 2000. The overall conclusion of the early literature—that studies using systematic review and meta-analysis were uneven in quality of conduct and reporting—has not changed in the interval since this book was published. The chapter goes on to define framing effects and the implications of the existence of framing effects for conclusions based on decision analysis. Criticisms of the use of QALYs in making clinical and policy decisions are delineated. League tables are described and their use is critiqued. The chapter ends by identifying the situations in which each method is most useful and the situations in which they may be misleading or wrong.

Keywords: systematic review; meta-analysis; decision analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; framing; quality-adjusted life years; QALY; ethics; league table; policy

Chapter.  8080 words. 

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.