Chapter

Orientation Representations and Frames of Reference: The COR Hypothesis

Michael McCloskey

in Visual Reflections

Published in print May 2009 | ISBN: 9780195168693
Published online May 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780199871513 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168693.003.0014

Series: Oxford Psychology Series

 							Orientation Representations and Frames of Reference: The COR Hypothesis

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter presents the coordinate-system orientation representation (COR) hypothesis. It lays out the assumptions of the COR and then discusses the various forms of orientation errors that could arise in constructing or using the posited representations. The hypothesis provides something that has been lacking in cognitive research on orientation: a conceptual framework for thinking about how the orientation of objects might be represented. It also calls attention to nonobvious differences among forms of orientation error (e.g., tilt-direction errors, reflections across object axes, reflections across external axes) and suggests underlying causes for each error type. Most notably, the hypothesis provides specific interpretations for the various forms of mirror-reflection error.

Keywords: visual perception; visual location; orientation perception; coordinate-system orientation representation hypothesis; mirror-reflection error

Chapter.  6294 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Cognitive Psychology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.