Chapter

Analogical Arguments

Paul F. A. Bartha

in By Parallel Reasoning

Published in print February 2010 | ISBN: 9780195325539
Published online May 2010 | e-ISBN: 9780199776313 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325539.003.0001
Analogical Arguments

Show Summary Details

Preview

This introductory chapter motivates the importance of a normative theory of analogical arguments as part of the broader project of understanding analogical reasoning. The chapter further recommends that we start with analogical arguments in science and mathematics, where we find clear and intuitively persuasive examples. Analogical arguments in science aim, in varying degrees, to establish the plausibility of a hypothesis. A distinction is made between a probabilistic notion of plausibility as reasonable credence, and a nonprobabilistic notion of prima facie plausibility, roughly the idea that a hypothesis is worthy of serious investigation. A basic characterization of analogical arguments is provided along with a preview of the theory to be developed in the book.

Keywords: plausibility; hypothesis; credence; probability

Chapter.  15134 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.