The High Court's Judgment on Renewal of President's Rule<sup>1</sup>

A.G. Noorani


Published in print January 2006 | ISBN: 9780195678291
Published online October 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199080588 | DOI:
The High Court's Judgment on Renewal of President's Rule1

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter examines the unanimous judgment of the Allahabad High Court on renewing the president's rule. Justices B. M. Lal, B. Kumar, and M. Katju of the Lucknow bench of Allahabad high court should be praised for their unanimous rulings on the three substantive issues involved in the case concerning the validity of the proclamation imposing president's rule in Uttar Pradesh. The first issue was whether the proclamation violated Clause 5 of Article 356, which limits the president's rule to a year unless there are justifiable reasons for extending it. The judges rules that there were no justifiable reasons. The second issue was whether the proclamation was in colourable exercise of power. The judges ruled that it was. The third issue was whether the governor was bound to invite the single largest party, the BJP, to form a government. On this issue too the bench ruled that he was not.

Keywords: B. M. Lal; B. Kumar; M. Katju; Allahabad High Court; president's rule

Chapter.  2475 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.