The Commission as Vendetta<sup>1</sup>

A.G. Noorani


Published in print January 2006 | ISBN: 9780195678291
Published online October 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199080588 | DOI:
The Commission as Vendetta1

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law


Show Summary Details


The appointment of S. Sivasubramanian, a retired judge of the Madras High Court, to head a Commission of Inquiry to probe charges against DMK leader M. Karunanidhi is an act of vendetta by the Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha. This is just one in a series of politically motivated commissions and hand-picked heads of Commission. Apart from being improper, such appointments to head a commission renders the commission unconstitutional. The Supreme Court while giving its advisory opinion on the Special Courts Bill 1978 had made it clear the Court would strike down the Bill unless the government gets it amended to provided that only a sitting judge of a high court would be appointed to preside over a special court. The appointment also would be made not merely after consultation with but with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of India.

Keywords: S. Sivasubramanian; Madras High Court; Commission of Inquiry; J. Jayalalitha; Supreme Court; sitting judge; special court; Chief Justice of India

Chapter.  1559 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.