Modern Historians of Ancient India

R.S. Sharma

in India’s Ancient Past

Published in print January 2007 | ISBN: 9780195687859
Published online October 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199080366 | DOI:
Modern Historians of Ancient India

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Ancient History (Non-Classical, to 500 CE)


Show Summary Details


The British interpretations of Indian history served to denigrate the Indians and their achievements, and justify the colonial rule. A few of these observations appeared to have some validity. Like, in comparison to the Chinese, Indians did not show any strong sense of chronology. However, generalizations made by colonialist historians were by and large either false or grossly exaggerated, but served as good propaganda material for the perpetuation of the despotic British rule. Most historians were guided by the nationalist ideas of Hindu revivalism, but there was no dearth of scholars who adopted a rationalist and objective approach. In the interpretation of history, there was a continuing struggle between colonialism and nationalism. However, the situation has undergone a change. The struggle now is between communalism and irrationalism, on the one hand, and rationalism and professionalism, on the other.

Keywords: Indian history; colonialist historians; British rule; Hindu revivalism; colonialism; nationalism; communalism

Chapter.  2870 words. 

Subjects: Ancient History (Non-Classical, to 500 CE)

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.