Generals as Governors<sup>1</sup>

Sanjib Baruah

in Durable Disorder

Published in print June 2007 | ISBN: 9780195690828
Published online October 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199081769 | DOI:
Generals as Governors1

Show Summary Details


When India became independent from British rule in 1947, it faced a major constitutional problem with respect to Manipur and other indirectly ruled ‘native states’. Indeed, the decision of the Kashmiri Maharaja to accede to India was responsible for the eruption of the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. Manipur’s merger with India is considered illegal and unconstitutional by a number of militias today. Like other states in the Indian Union, Manipur has an elected chief minister and an elected state legislature. However, it also has a de facto parallel structure of governance directly controlled from Delhi that manages counter-insurgency operations. Aside from Manipur, four other states of Northeast India today have militias of varying levels of activity and intensity. In an attempt to control this reality, the central government has been appointing retired generals as governors to monitor the dilution of civil political authority in the Northeast.

Keywords: Manipur; Northeast India; State within a State; Indian generals; Indian governors; Indian army; counter-insurgency; militias; conflict; constitutional propriety

Chapter.  8694 words. 

Subjects: Indian Politics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.