Connection of Judgements

Ross Harrison

in On What There Must Be

Published in print September 1974 | ISBN: 9780198245070
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191680830 | DOI:
Connection of Judgements

Show Summary Details


This chapter describes the connection of judgements. It first addresses informal argument. As a premiss, it ultimately depends upon assumption and agreement, and the first premiss is introduced and used as an unsupported premiss. It is indicated that a fundamental feature of any comprehensible world is that the protagonist (of that world) should be able to make some distinction between those judgements that he could make which would be true (or apply to the world), and those judgements that he could make which would be false (would not apply to the world). The historical use of the first premiss is reported. Leibniz took his philosophy as resting on two premisses or principles, the principle of non-contradiction and the principle of sufficient reason. In addition, immediate deductions from the first premiss, laws, the case where the protagonist is always right, and the alternative premisses are covered.

Keywords: judgements; informal argument; premiss; comprehensible world; Leibniz; protagonist; laws

Chapter.  15734 words. 

Subjects: Metaphysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.