An Empirical Disproof of Determinism?

Keith Lehrer

in Metamind

Published in print June 1990 | ISBN: 9780198248507
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191681141 | DOI:
An Empirical Disproof of Determinism?

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Metaphysics


Show Summary Details


According to philosophers, the statement that a person could have done what she did not do lacks the proper epistemic credentials. The reason why this statement has been the bone of philosophical contention is its connection with the problem of free will and determinism. It is usually held that a person acts of her own free will only if she could have acted otherwise. However, both libertarians and determinists have had their doubts about the epistemic qualificiations of such statements. This chapter, however, shows that it is possible to know empirically that a person could have done otherwise. It establishes how it is known what a person can do, and then shows that skeptical doubt concerning knowledge of what people can do is no better grounded than skeptical doubt concerning knowledge of the colour properties of unobserved objects.

Keywords: free will; determinism; knowledge; consistency; libertarians

Chapter.  8985 words. 

Subjects: Metaphysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.