Chapter

Justifications for retrospective law

Charles Sampford

in RETROSPECTIVITY AND THE RULE OF LAW

Published in print March 2006 | ISBN: 9780198252986
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191681394 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198252986.003.0007
Justifications for retrospective law

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Two apparent things have emerged in the course of discussing retrospective law making, including the idea that this kind of legislation is widely acceptable and implemented and that, it is a manifestation of an ultimate contradiction against the detrimental notion about retrospectivity. Given the existence of prospective legislation, retroactivity still occupies a significant position in the courts of many nationalities. After such establishment, the next concern is about the determination on when retrospective law is validated. For absolutist critiques, the most convincing justification is to view retrospectivity as a ‘necessary evil’ especially under unusual conditions. Others contest that proper utilization of the concept lead to the endorsement and the realization of values put forward by the legal system. Thus, it is just right to claim that retrospectivity is an innate and a crucial component of a well-organized and a fully established community that operates under the Rule of Law.

Keywords: retrospective law making; retrospectivity; prospective legislation; Rule of Law; necessary evil

Chapter.  13728 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.