Chapter

Offence Requirements

Paul H. Robinson

in Structure and Function in Criminal Law

Published in print September 1997 | ISBN: 9780198258865
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191681875 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258865.003.0003

Series: Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice

Offence Requirements

Show Summary Details

Preview

The most basic organising distinction of offence requirements in current law has been the actus reus-mens rea distinction. This chapter specifically starts by exploring the weaknesses of and the potential for confusion in the use of that distinction. It also recommends that use of the distinction be abandoned. It then offers as a replacement an alternative three-part conceptualisation of offence requirements, distinguishing what it calls objective, culpability, and act — omission requirements. Each of these three groups of doctrines is then examined. The current conceptualisation of each is summarised and refinements of it suggested. The actus reus-mens rea distinction reflects no discernible underlying concept; neither ‘actus reus’ requirements nor ‘mens rea’ requirements share a common characteristic or function. Moreover, it argues that current conceptualisation is flawed in two respects.

Keywords: actus reus-mens rea distinction; offence requirements; current law; conceptualisation

Chapter.  20302 words. 

Subjects: Criminal Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.