Chapter

Agrapha

J. K. Elliott

in The Apocryphal New Testament

Published in print November 2005 | ISBN: 9780198261827
Published online April 2009 |
Agrapha

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Religious Studies
  • Biblical Studies

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This inappropriate word is used conventionally to refer to sayings of Jesus not found in the canonical Gospels. Collections of agrapha have included words of Jesus that are found elsewhere in the New Testament canon (e.g. at Acts 20: 35) in individual manuscripts of the Greek New Testament (e.g. the longer text after Luke 6: 4 in Codex Bezae; the Freer logion in the longer ending of Mark), in the apocryphal texts, and in patristic works. The relevance of including such material in a volume of apocryphal texts is debatable. Much of the material really belongs to the realm of New Testament textual criticism; other passages are best considered within a study of the individual patristic works. Yet convention seems to require at least a token recognition that such a category belongs in a collection of apocryphal material. This has been the case since Resch's pioneering work assembling such material. His second edition of 1906 included nearly 200 agrapha mainly from patristic sources. Ropes is credited with having provided an antidote to Resch's over‐enthusiastic but often uncritical collection, by separating material likely to be authentic from that which is obviously secondary. Ropes eliminated many of Resch's agrapha and divided the remainder into valueless agrapha, possibly valuable agrapha, and valuable agrapha. The refining process was continued by Jeremias both in his Unbekannte Jesusworte and even more so in his section on the agrapha in Hennecke–Schneemelcher3. The process has been furthered by Jeremias' successor, Hofius, in Hennecke5, where only seven agrapha are included. The criterion for the selection there seems to be their possible authenticity. Such a criterion is of interest in so far that it is theoretically possible that some ipsissima verba of Jesus continued to circulate independently as stray survivals from an unwritten tradition, and even after the circulation of the canonical Gospels, until they were eventually incorporated into later writings, but ‘authenticity’ and ‘originality’ are not normally the criteria applied to the selection of apocryphal texts. (Few would pass those tests!)

Chapter.  1906 words. 

Subjects: Religious Studies ; Biblical Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.