The Verdict of Scripture

Alan C. Clifford

in Atonement and Justification

Published in print April 1990 | ISBN: 9780198261957
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191682254 | DOI:
The Verdict of Scripture

Show Summary Details


This chapter examines scriptural evidence with a view to reaching an authoritative verdict regarding atonement. By comparing the textual comments of John Owen, John Wesley, and Richard Baxter, it attempts to evaluate their respective claims truly to represent the teaching of the Bible. It argues that Owen cannot justify his particularist thesis exegetically. Without minimizing Wesley's deficiencies with regard to the ultimate success of the gospel, his exegesis of the disputed texts has more affinity with Reformation Calvinism than Owen's does. Only by imposing a preconceived theological strait-jacket on the textual data, and flying in the face of the criterion of perspicuity, can Owen's case appear credible. Without pretending that Baxter's overall presentation is flawless, his fundamental view of the atonement — a via media between Owen's particularism and Wesley's universalism — must surely commend itself as a valid biblical alternative. Notwithstanding minor exegetical variations, Baxter's position may now be seen as a basic reaffirmation of Calvin's soteriology.

Keywords: Calvinist—Arminian controversy; Calvinism; Arminanism; atonement; John Calvin; John Owen; John Wesley; Richard Baxter; Protestants

Chapter.  10285 words. 

Subjects: Christian Theology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.