Chapter

The Reformation Heritage

Alan C. Clifford

in Atonement and Justification

Published in print April 1990 | ISBN: 9780198261957
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191682254 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198261957.003.0010
The Reformation Heritage

Show Summary Details

Preview

Both Owen and Wesley regarded themselves as champions of Reformed Anglicanism, but they interpreted Anglican doctrine differently. Whereas Owen declared, ‘the Church of England is in her doctrine express as unto the imputation of the righteousness of Christ, both active and passive, as it is usually distinguished’, Wesley emphatically denied the view of James Hervey and others that ‘imputed righteousness’ is spoken of in the Prayer Book, Articles, and Homilies. This chapter argues that this important difference serves to indicate that the Calvinist—Arminian controversy involved the doctrines of the atonement and justification, just as surely as the two subjects are themselves intimately bound together.

Keywords: John Owen; John Wesley; Anglicanism; Protestant Reformation; Calvinist—Arminian controversy; atonement; justification

Chapter.  6740 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Christian Theology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.