Chapter

Introduction

ELIZABETH COOKE

in The Modern Law of Estoppel

Published in print March 2000 | ISBN: 9780198262220
Published online January 2010 | e-ISBN: 9780191714412 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262220.003.0001
Introduction

Show Summary Details

Preview

Generally, there is nothing wrong in changing one's mind. But sometimes it is unkind, and socially unacceptable. An example is withdrawing from a dinner engagement at the last minute. The law may make this practice impossible, or impose penalties for doing so — particularly when it amounts to a breach of contract. This book is about the very limited circumstances when changing one's mind is legally unacceptable even though it is not a breach of contract. Estoppel is a mechanism for enforcing consistency; when a person has said or done something that leads another to believe in a particular state of affairs, he or she may be obliged to stand by what they have said or done, even though they are not contractually bound to do so.

Keywords: law; obligations; breach of contract; consistency

Chapter.  2556 words. 

Subjects: Civil Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.