Chapter

Conclusion

Roger A. Shiner

in Freedom of Commercial Expression

Published in print November 2003 | ISBN: 9780198262619
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191682353 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262619.003.0015
Conclusion

Show Summary Details

Preview

It is necessary to take the array of arguments for the commercial expression doctrine that emerge from the court cases cited in the previous chapters and assess their cogency. The arguments make many tacit assumptions — assumptions about the nature of rights, about what it is to defend a jurisprudential thesis, about the nature of constitutional rights, and about the appropriate way to argue for constitutional rights. Essentially, there are several theses that emerge about commercial expression or commercial speech in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Virginia Board, such as: commercial speech cannot be wholly outside the protection of the First Amendment; the purely economic interest of the speaker of commercial speech is a constitutionally legitimate interest; society also has an interest in the free flow of commercial information, because some commercial messages deal with matters of public interest; for the government to decide which information is proper for citizens to receive is unacceptable paternalism; and there are commonsense differences between commercial speech and other speech, which differences imply that commercial speech may receive a lower level of constitutional protection.

Keywords: Supreme Court; court cases; constitutional rights; constitutional protection; paternalism; economic interest; commercial speech; commercial information; public interest

Chapter.  3123 words. 

Subjects: Human Rights and Immigration

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.