Ricœur on Metaphor and Metaphorical Reference

James Fodor

in Christian Hermeneutics

Published in print October 1995 | ISBN: 9780198263494
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191682575 | DOI:
Ricœur on Metaphor and Metaphorical Reference

Show Summary Details


By modifying Jakobson's insights on split reference and by transporting Frege's notions of sense and reference, Ricœur has fashioned an account of metaphorical reference to meet the anti-referential challenges instigated by certain forms of English literary criticism. While a certain ambivalence exists between the first- and second-order reference, and that this is not quite right about Ricœur's account of metaphor, it is not extreme enough to cause one to abandon his account completely because it is beyond repair. Since Ricœur's study of narrative and its functions are logical extensions of his investigation of metaphor and its function, it is anticipated that some of the same problems recur while remaining alert to the ways in which his analysis of time might rearrange the problematic of reference. Also discussed in here are the ambiguities of split reference; redescription and the genuinely new; and residual positivism and the literal–metaphorical distinction.

Keywords: Jakobson; split reference; Frege; sense; metaphorical reference; narrative; positivism

Chapter.  15120 words. 

Subjects: Christian Theology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.