The Concept of a Civil Wrong


in The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law

Published in print July 1997 | ISBN: 9780198265795
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191682971 | DOI:
The Concept of a Civil Wrong

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter is concerned with the common law, but it has a Roman beginning. By starting from the Roman analysis in which it had its origin, one can most easily set out the common law classification in which civil wrongs, or torts, form one important category. The concept of a civil wrong cannot be investigated other than in the context of that classification. The second-century jurist Gaius was the first to advance the proposition that every obligation arises from a contract, a wrong, or from some other causal event. However, he saw that that would not do, for there were indisputable instances of legal obligation handed down from the unsystematic past which arose from neither. The obligation to return a mistaken payment was a prominent example. The threefold classification – contracts, wrongs, and other events – was not the end of the Roman story. The miscellaneous third category posed a challenge.

Keywords: common law; torts; civil wrong; classification; Gaius; obligation; contracts; wrongs; events

Chapter.  10855 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.