The Standards of Care in Negligence Law


in The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law

Published in print July 1997 | ISBN: 9780198265795
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191682971 | DOI:
The Standards of Care in Negligence Law

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter challenges the utilitarians’ claim with respect to the standards of care in negligence law. Negligence liability is the most common type of tort liability and is thought to be the most obvious example of tort law’s utilitarian foundation. If the utilitarian efficiency theory cannot explain negligence liability – its prime doctrinal example in its favorite field of common-law liability – it is in very serious trouble. Conversely, if the equal freedom theory can explain and justify negligence liability, it will have cleared what many see as the biggest hurdle for a non-utilitarian theory of tort liability. Negligence is generally described as behaviour that creates unreasonable foreseeable risks of injury. Almost all jury instructions do not provide any test or definition of what constitutes unreasonably risky behavior, other than an often circular reference to the ‘ordinary care’ that would be exercised by the reasonable or prudent person in the same or similar circumstances.

Keywords: utilitarian; standards; care; negligence law; liability; tort law; equal freedom; risky behavior; injury

Chapter.  13162 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.