Chapter

The Seriousness of Harm Thesis for Abnormally Dangerous Activities

KEN KRESS

in The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law

Published in print July 1997 | ISBN: 9780198265795
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191682971 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265795.003.0013
The Seriousness of Harm Thesis for Abnormally Dangerous Activities

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter concerns the reasons given for finding activities abnormally dangerous and therefore subject to strict liability. Once again, risk predominates. As Justice Linde states: ‘Whether the danger is so great as to give rise to strict liability depends both on the probability and on the magnitude of the threatened harm’. According to the received view, either small probabilities of large harms or large probabilities of small harms suffice for strict liability. On this common view, whether an activity is subject to abnormally dangerous strict liability depends upon the magnitude of the expected disvalue – a function of both the probability of harm and the magnitude of the harm – that it imposes. The chapter argues that the magnitude of the loss is the major factor determining abnormally dangerous activities.

Keywords: dangerous activities; strict liability; risk; probabilities; harm; disvalue; loss

Chapter.  10030 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.