Preview
This chapter tries to meet the fundamental challenge to natural law theory and other ‘cognitivist’ ethical theories mounted by ‘subjectivists’ or ‘non-cognitivists’ who are deeply skeptical of reason’s capacity to identify non-instrumental reasons for action and objective norms of morality. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, a contemporary philosopher who presents a sophisticated and vigorous critique of natural law ethical theory from a neo-Humean point of view, is a principal interlocutor. He maintains that moral norms and other basic practical principles are, in the end, mere projections of subjective feeling or emotion. The chapter also engages Goldsworthy’s very capable representation of John Mackie’s argument ‘from queerness’ against belief in objective values, and his claim that non-cognitivism offers ‘the best explanation’ for our moral experience.
Keywords: natural law; ethical theories; morality; emotion; Jeffrey Goldsworthy
Chapter. 6463 words.
Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
Go to Oxford Scholarship Online » abstract
Full text: subscription required
How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian
Buy this work at Oxford University Press »
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.