Divorce in the United States

Ira Mark Ellman

in Cross Currents

Published in print December 2000 | ISBN: 9780198268208
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191683442 | DOI:
Divorce in the United States

Show Summary Details


Recent interest in fault divorce seems part of a more general cultural trend favoring traditional values, a trend which probably also contributes to the downward movement in divorce rates. One might conclude that the arguments for reviving fault law are simply too weak on merits to prevail in the end. The covenant marriage movement has adopted the politically clever tactic of portraying itself as merely giving prospective spouses a choice, and of relabeling the newly available choice with the appealing term ‘covenant’ rather than the more accurate term of fault divorce. Even so, it has had a difficult time making headway since its initial adoption in Louisiana. Arizona amended the Louisiana package to permit divorce by mutual consent, and even by unilateral consent with a two-year waiting period, but even this much weakened version passed by the narrowest of margins. Covenant marriage proposals have been defeated in other states. The belief that marriage and divorce are matters for regulation by private commitment rather than legal compulsion appears to remain strong.

Keywords: Louisiana; Arizona; divorce; marriage; fault divorce; covenant marriage; consent; private commitment; legal compulsion

Chapter.  10856 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Family Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.