The Plurality of Forms

Richard Cross

in The Physics of Duns Scotus

Published in print November 1998 | ISBN: 9780198269748
Published online October 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191683787 | DOI:
The Plurality of Forms

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Philosophy of Religion


Show Summary Details


This chapter discusses the plurality of forms. The discussion starts with the theories of Scotus's opponents, Aquinas and Henry of Ghent, and Scotus's objections to these theories. Then, it outlines Scotus's own theories. According to Aquinas, it is impossible for a composite substance to have more than one substantial form. On the contrary, Scotus argues that some composite substances have more than one substantial form. He believes that one form is sufficient in the case of non-living things; but in the case of living things, more than one form is needed. The forms that Scotus lays down are the form of the body, the animating form or soul, and the forms of the body's organs. He also proposes that it is not necessary to assume the existence of the forms of the elements in a compound substance.

Keywords: Henry of Ghent; Aquinas; form of the body; animating form; form of body organs; composite substances; plurality of forms

Chapter.  12185 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy of Religion

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.