Robert Stevens

in Torts and Rights

Published in print September 2007 | ISBN: 9780199211609
Published online January 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780191705946 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


Sometimes labelled ‘proximate cause’ or ‘legal cause’, remoteness concerns the scope of responsibility for wrongdoing. The dominant approach is to apply a test of reasonable foreseeability to determine whether a loss is too remote. This chapter examines the inadequacies of this test both as an inclusionary and exclusionary rule, and the failure of the logic of the Wagon Mound (No 1) from which it is derived. When loss is coincidental to a wrong, and when it is outside of the scope of the purpose of the right relied upon, are also illustrated. When the chain of causation is broken by intervening conduct of third parties and the claimant himself is shown.

Keywords: remoteness; proximate cause; legal cause; Wagon Mound; coincidental loss

Chapter.  11712 words. 

Subjects: Civil Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.