Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence

Thomas Kelly

in Disagreement

Published in print August 2010 | ISBN: 9780199226078
Published online September 2010 | e-ISBN: 9780191594236 | DOI:
Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence

Show Summary Details


This chapter distinguishes and assesses a set of views about the rational response to peer disagreement. It raises a series of objections to views according to which one should assign ‘equal weight’ to one's own view and the views of those with which one disagrees. It concludes by defending ‘The Total Evidence View’, according to which what one is justified in believing in cases of peer disagreement depends upon what is supported by one's total evidence.

Keywords: peer disagreement; higher order evidence; equal weight view; total evidence; justification

Chapter.  27727 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.