Coleridge, Wordsworth and the Language of Allusion

In this study of two creative minds, this book offers a new version of the Coleridge–Wordsworth interaction during its most crucial years: 1797–1807. Rejecting all those accounts (including the poets' own) that have sought to construe difference as compatibility, the book argues that it is only on the surface that each poet appears to be the other's ideal audience. Below the surface, there were radical differences, of a theoretical and imaginative kind, which led to misunderstanding. The central argument of the book is that such a ‘misunderstanding’ was creative and, for both poets, a means...

In this study of two creative minds, this book offers a new version of the Coleridge–Wordsworth interaction during its most crucial years: 1797–1807. Rejecting all those accounts (including the poets' own) that have sought to construe difference as compatibility, the book argues that it is only on the surface that each poet appears to be the other's ideal audience. Below the surface, there were radical differences, of a theoretical and imaginative kind, which led to misunderstanding. The central argument of the book is that such a ‘misunderstanding’ was creative and, for both poets, a means of self-definition. The key to this interpretation is in the poets' private language: they were not only ‘men speaking to men’, but poets speaking to poets, and it is in their use of literary allusion that their tacit opposition emerges. Indeed, by examining the range of strategies open to any writer using private allusion, this book reveals this mode to be potentially the most aggressive of literary forms.