Chapter

Freedom of Illocution? Response to Daniel Jacobson

Rae Langton

in Sexual Solipsism

Published in print January 2009 | ISBN: 9780199247066
Published online January 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191594823 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0004
Freedom of Illocution? Response to Daniel Jacobson

Show Summary Details

Preview

Jacobson argues that free speech does not include freedom of illocution, that pornography does not in any case silence women. Just as well, or rape would not count as rape, since a silenced woman would not have refused sex. Jacobson is mistaken. Free speech includes more than freedom to say meaningful words, as Mill saw. It includes freedom to perform communicative illocutions, enabled by reciprocity, a mutual capacity for uptake. A woman who has her refusal silenced is still raped, since she does not consent. And women do encounter the silence of illocutionary disablement, on an Austinian understanding of speech. His allegation of ‘confusion’ is no more than a rejection of the Austinian starting point.

Keywords: free speech; Mill; Austin; illocution; perlocution; consent; refusal; reciprocity; uptake; rape

Chapter.  4575 words. 

Subjects: Feminist Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.