Preliminary Discussion of the General Economic Torts

Hazel Carty

in An Analysis of the Economic Torts

Second edition

Published in print November 2010 | ISBN: 9780199546749
Published online January 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191594946 | DOI:
Preliminary Discussion of the General Economic Torts

Show Summary Details


The recent House of Lords' decisions in OBG v Allan and Total Network SL v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, reveal the conflict of policy within the highest court and are subjected to a preliminary discussion in this chapter. In Allen v Flood, the House of Lords adopted the abstentionist agenda for the general economic torts: even where intentional and unjustified economic harm was inflicted, liability would only follow where unlawful means where used. And a two-tort analysis of economic tort liability was offered, based on the indirect infliction of economic harm in a three-party setting. Subsequently these torts got into an incoherent mess but in OBG the House of Lords appeared to herald a return to a narrow application as envisaged in Allen. Unfortunately, within eighteen months the House of Lords in Total Network appeared to shift these torts from the abstentionist to interventionist track, resulting in further mess.

Keywords: OBG v Allan; Total Network SL v Revenue; abstentionist agenda; interventionist agenda; three-party setting

Chapter.  7391 words. 

Subjects: Intellectual Property Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.