Inducing Breach of Contract

Hazel Carty

in An Analysis of the Economic Torts

Second edition

Published in print November 2010 | ISBN: 9780199546749
Published online January 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191594946 | DOI:
Inducing Breach of Contract

Show Summary Details


The classic form of this tort, as featured in Lumley v Gye, involves the defendant persuading the claimant's contract partner to contract breach. Subsequently courts accepted varieties of this tort, some of which focused not on inducement but prevention and one of which focused on interference rather than inducement. This uncertain ambit resulted from the failure to identify the other major general economic tort namely the unlawful means tort. OBG re-asserts the classic scope of this tort, rejecting the modern varieties (most of which would now be covered by the unlawful means tort) and restricting liability to those claimants who have actual knowledge of the contract which they seek to persuade the claimant's partner to breach. This chapter explores the development of this tort, its relationship to the unlawful means tort and its analysis in OBG as a tort of secondary or accessory civil liability.

Keywords: breach of contract; Lumley v Gye; contract partner; interference; unlawful means tort; secondary civil liability; accessory civil liability

Chapter.  25105 words. 

Subjects: Intellectual Property Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.