Chapter

Proportional Sentences at the ICTY

Jens David Ohlin

in The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Published in print May 2011 | ISBN: 9780199573417
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191728822 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573417.003.0012
Proportional Sentences at the ICTY

Show Summary Details

Preview

Sentences handed down at the ICTY have generally been lower than sentences handed down by the ICTR or by many domestic penal systems punishing individuals for domestic crimes. This chapter diagnoses this situation and concludes that the situation stems from a conflict between two different ideas of proportionality: defendant-relative proportionality and offence gravity proportionality. Although bearing some similarity to the categories first used by A. V. Hirsch, the categories are used to different effect in this chapter. Defendant-relative proportionality insists that defendants with a greater degree of culpability should receive a longer prison sentence compared with defendants with lower culpability, while offence gravity proportionality insists that each defendant should receive punishment that adequate accords with the gravity of the offence. These two senses of proportionality come into conflict at the ICTY when the only way to preserve defendant-relative proportionality is to scale down the punishment of those who are less culpable — a result which conflicts with offence gravity proportionality. The ICTY sentencing jurisprudence has fallen victim to this dilemma. Offence gravity proportionality is normatively prior and that a tribunal — like the ICTY — faced with sacrificing one over the other ought to prioritize offence gravity proportionality. The warrant for this conclusion is that the harsh treatment associated with offence gravity proportionality vindicates the Rule of Law by providing a hypothetical war criminal with a maxim for action (in the Kantian sense) that makes compliance with the law rational.

Keywords: sentencing; proportionality; ICTY; war crimes; Rule of Law

Chapter.  11895 words. 

Subjects: Public International Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.