Intentionally Killing the ‘Permanently Unconscious’

John Finnis

in Intention and Identity

Published in print April 2011 | ISBN: 9780199580064
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191729386 | DOI:
Intentionally Killing the ‘Permanently Unconscious’

Show Summary Details


This chapter presents a critique of the decision of the House of Lords in Bland, upholding the withdrawing of food and water from Bland, with intent to terminate his life, on the ground that because he was in PVS (a permanent vegetative state) it was no longer worth living. The significance of the Lords' distinction between action and omission is questioned. The dualism involved in various judicial dicta about his life is critiqued. The very limited decriminalization of suicide in 1961 was not a recognition of ‘the principle of self-determination’. The intent in withdrawing sustenance to invalids whose death is not imminent is distinguished from the intent in desisting from medical treatments.

Keywords: action and omission; intent; Bland; PVS; withdrawal of treatment; withdrawal of nutrition and hydration; decriminalization of suicide; self-determination; life worth living; dualism

Chapter.  4092 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.