Chapter

Recent Critics of the Rationality-to-Morality Argument

James P. Sterba

in From Rationality to Equality

Published in print December 2012 | ISBN: 9780199580767
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780191745836 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580767.003.0004
Recent Critics of the Rationality-to-Morality Argument

Show Summary Details

Preview

As one might expect, the argument from rationality to morality presented in the previous chapter has not been without its critics. In fact, the argument in its present form owes a great deal to past critiques of its earlier incarnations.As one might expect as well, my now refurbished and more developed justification for morality has attracted a new set of formidable critics, in particular, Charles Mills, Candace Volger, Anita Superson, Russ Shafer-Landau, and Alan Gibbard. Like many of my past critics, these recent critics also look upon my argument for morality, for the most part, with deadly intent. This chapter purports to show how the argument can, in fact, be strengthened and developed through responding to these critics.

Keywords: rationality; morality; John Rawls; Stephen Darwall; moral skepticism

Chapter.  9319 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.