Chapter

Legal Control in Roman Egypt

Benjamin Kelly

in Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt

Published in print September 2011 | ISBN: 9780199599615
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191731525 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599615.003.0003

Series: Oxford Studies in Ancient Documents

Legal Control in Roman Egypt

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter argues that the structural features and ideological context of the legal system of Roman Egypt made it unlikely that many petitions would have ended in firm judgments which were then successfully enforced. This was the consequence of an overly complicated legal system, which had a large number of adjudicative officials with substantially overlapping jurisdictions. The system was prone to delays and open to abuse and obfuscation by litigants who wanted to delay the progress of a case. As far as we can tell, individual officials mostly discharged their duties at any given stage with efficiency and in accordance with the bureaucratic ideology of the province, which stressed diligence, propriety, and rationality. But this ideology slowed the processing of cases.

Keywords: ideology; jurisdictions; delay; obfuscation; efficiency; diligence; propriety; rationality

Chapter.  20677 words. 

Subjects: Classical History

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.