Peirce on Miracles:

Benjamin C. Jantzen

in Probability in the Philosophy of Religion

Published in print April 2012 | ISBN: 9780199604760
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191741548 | DOI:
Peirce on Miracles:

Show Summary Details


This chapter presents a Peircean critique of the Bayesian approach to historical inference. In particular, it examines a suite of arguments from C. S. Peirce against the use of Bayesian methods to ascribe a probability to the occurrence of a miracle on the basis of historical witness testimony. An exegetical account is given of the ‘Method of Balancing Likelihoods’, the Bayesian position which Peirce presents as a charitable reconstruction of Hume’s argument against miracles. Peirce’s criticisms of this method are examined, and most are found to depend crucially on his account of probability. It is argued, however, that the most effective criticism is independent of any particular account of probability and so presents a challenge to modern Bayesian epistemology. This latter criticism points to a sampling bias that necessarily accompanies the use of historical testimony.

Keywords: Peirce; Hume; miracles; Bayesian; likelihood; testimony

Chapter.  10583 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy of Religion

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.