Indirect Death

L.W. Sumner

in Assisted Death

Published in print July 2011 | ISBN: 9780199607983
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780191729652 | DOI:
Indirect Death

Show Summary Details


The argument in this chapter examines two accepted palliative care measures that may have the capacity to hasten death: pain control by means of high doses of opioids and terminal sedation. The standard defence of these measures through the Doctrine of Double Effect is then explored and three conclusions are drawn: (1) the Doctrine has no application to these end‐of‐life cases since it assumes that death is invariably a harm; (2) the concept of intention does not allow a bright line to be drawn between permissible and impermissible measures; and (3) in these end‐of‐life contexts the intending/foreseeing distinction makes no ethical difference.

Keywords: pain control; terminal sedation; double effect; intention; intending/foreseeing

Chapter.  13932 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.