Chapter

Waiver Rewards and Deserved Punishment

Richard L. Lippke

in The Ethics of Plea Bargaining

Published in print October 2011 | ISBN: 9780199641468
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191732195 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641468.003.0004

Series: Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice

Waiver Rewards and Deserved Punishment

Show Summary Details

Preview

The questions addressed concern whether and to what extent waiver rewards comport with a desert-based justification of legal punishment. They might if such rewards are appropriate responses to defendants who spare us the burdens of having to conduct criminal trials. Alternatively, waiver rewards might be cast as useful tools in the expansion of deserved punishment. However, neither of these arguments succeeds in showing that state officials should be permitted to negotiate substantial and variable waiver rewards with defendants. Modest, fixed sentence discounts comport better with absolute and comparative justice in sentencing, and might produce levels of deserved punishment that rival those produced by robust waiver rewards. Once a critical perspective is brought to bear on existing laws and sentencing schemes, it becomes much less clear whether an increase in the number of criminal convictions—the main selling point of robust forms of plea bargaining—yields more deserved punishment.

Keywords: waiver rewards; deserved punishment; trial burdens; absolute justice; comparative justice; overcriminalization

Chapter.  17869 words. 

Subjects: Criminal Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.