Chapter

Plea Bargains as Contracts

Richard L. Lippke

in The Ethics of Plea Bargaining

Published in print October 2011 | ISBN: 9780199641468
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191732195 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641468.003.0008

Series: Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice

Plea Bargains as Contracts

Show Summary Details

Preview

Another traditional defense of plea bargaining claims that waiver rewards of any size or kind are legitimate if the contracting parties—usually prosecutors and defendants (or their attorneys)—freely agree to them. Yet contract theorists have not been careful to note the ways in which both parties can act wrongly in reaching plea agreements or trade in goods to which they are not morally entitled. Plea bargained agreements will often, as a result, be unworthy of our respect even if they are freely reached. In fact, the plea agreements which are respectable are ones for which we have independent grounds for believing that criminal offenders receive sentences appropriate to their crimes. The conclusion reached is that the element of free agreement, so prized in other contexts, has a minimal justificatory role in the realm of criminal justice.

Keywords: contract; waiver rewards; coercion; trial penalties; overcharging; entitlements; legal punishment

Chapter.  12589 words. 

Subjects: Criminal Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.