Malone’s <i>Double Falsehood</i><sup>*</sup>

Ivan Lupić

in The Quest for Cardenio

Published in print September 2012 | ISBN: 9780199641819
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191749025 | DOI:
Malone’s Double Falsehood*

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)


Show Summary Details


This chapter discusses the marginal notes Edmond Malone made in his copy of the second issue of the 1728 edition of Double Falsehood. Malone’s observations are placed in the context of other eighteenth-century attempts to understand the relationship between Theobald’s play and (The History of) Cardenio, especially those of Isaac Reed and George Steevens, hitherto neglected by scholars. New information on the fate of the surviving external evidence relating to Double Falsehood and Cardenio is presented and interpreted within the larger framework of eighteenth-century attribution studies. The insights gained from this act of historical recovery are then brought to bear on the current discussion of Shakespeare’s collaborative plays.

Keywords: Cardenio; Double Falsehood; Lewis Theobald; Edmond Malone; George Steevens; Isaac Reed; collaboration; attribution; external evidence; marginalia

Chapter.  11452 words. 

Subjects: Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.