Chapter

The Authenticity of the Holy Sepulchre

Jerome Murphy‐O'Connor

in Keys to Jerusalem

Published in print February 2012 | ISBN: 9780199642021
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191738555 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642021.003.0010
The Authenticity of the Holy Sepulchre

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter examines the authenticity of the Holy Sepulchre. The analysis focuses on two individuals, Macarius, Bishop of Jerusalem/Aelia Capitolina (c.313–34), and his metropolitan, Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea (c.313–40). Clearly Macarius would have been willing to identify as belonging to Christ anything remotely resembling a tomb that he found at the bottom of his trench. The question related to him, therefore, is: how could he have been so confident of the traditional site identification of his community? Eusebius, on the other hand, had been trained as a historian, and was constitutionally sceptical regarding relics and holy places. In principle, he would have accorded little confidence to the Jerusalem tradition. Thus, the question regarding him is: what convinced him, rather against his will, that the cave brought to light by Macarius was in fact the tomb in which Christ had been laid? In order to answer these questions, responses to a further series of questions must be found. Did first-century Christians in Jerusalem know exactly where Jesus died and was buried? Did they have an interest in passing that knowledge on to subsequent generations? Were there any factors that intensified this interest? Were there any impediments to that transmission, for instance, breaks in the history of the community?

Keywords: bishops; Macarius; Eusebius; Jerusalem; Caesarea

Chapter.  15377 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Biblical Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.