Preview
Who may forgive? Most philosophical accounts assume that only the victim of a wrongdoing has the standing to forgive. In many cases, this answer to the question is asserted without even an attempt at offering a supporting argument. However, when reasons are offered, they tend to take one of four forms: the debt-cancelling argument, the emotion-based argument, the relation-based argument, or the normative difference argument. In this chapter, these four arguments are shown to be inadequate. In addition, a case is made for expanding the class of those with the standing to forgive to include second and third parties.
Keywords: forgiveness; resentment; indignation; third-party forgiveness; debt cancellation
Chapter. 9437 words.
Subjects: Moral Philosophy
Go to Oxford Scholarship Online » abstract
Full text: subscription required
How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian
Buy this work at Oxford University Press »
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.