Kieran Setiya

in Knowing Right From Wrong

Published in print November 2012 | ISBN: 9780199657452
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780191745539 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


This chapter confronts the challenge of ethical disagreement. It argues that we should reject conciliatory accounts of disagreement in general. At the same time, standard theories of justification in ethics support the inference from disagreement to scepticism. In order to resist this inference, we must reject epistemologies of intuition, coherence, and reflective equilibrium. The problem of disagreement can be solved only if the basic standards of epistemology in ethics are ‘biased towards the truth’. The chapter concludes with a ‘Reductive Epistemology’ on which the evidence for ethical claims consists in evidence for non-ethical facts in virtue of which they are, or would be, true.

Keywords: coherence; disagreement; epistemology; ethics; evidence; intuitionism; justification; reflective equilibrium; scepticism; supervenience

Chapter.  15705 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.